GitHub Agentic Workflows

Blog

Meet the Workflows: Issue Triage

Peli de Halleux

Welcome back to Peli’s Agent Factory!

We’re the GitHub Next team. Over the past months, we’ve built and operated a collection of automated agentic workflows. These aren’t just demos - these are real agents doing actual work in our github/gh-aw repository and others.

Think of this as your guided tour through our agent factory. We’re showcasing the workflows that caught our attention. Every workflow links to its source markdown file, so you can peek under the hood and see exactly how it works.

To start the tour, let’s begin with one of the simpler workflows that handles incoming activity - issue triage.

Issue triage represents a “hello world” of automated agentic workflows: practical, immediately useful, relatively simple, and impactful. It’s used as the starter example in other agentic automation technologies like Claude Code in GitHub Actions.

When a new issue is opened, the triage agent analyzes its content, does research in the codebase and other issues, responds with a comment, and applies appropriate labels based on predefined categories. This helps maintainers quickly understand the nature of incoming issues without manual review.

Let’s take a look at the full Issue Triage Agent:

---
timeout-minutes: 5
on:
issue:
types: [opened, reopened]
permissions:
issues: read
tools:
github:
toolsets: [issues, labels]
safe-outputs:
add-labels:
allowed: [bug, feature, enhancement, documentation, question, help-wanted, good-first-issue]
add-comment: {}
---
# Issue Triage Agent
List open issues in ${{ github.repository }} that have no labels. For each
unlabeled issue, analyze the title and body, then add one of the allowed
labels: `bug`, `feature`, `enhancement`, `documentation`, `question`,
`help-wanted`, or `good-first-issue`.
Skip issues that:
- Already have any of these labels
- Have been assigned to any user (especially non-bot users)
Do research on the issue in the context of the codebase and, after
adding the label to an issue, mention the issue author in a comment, explain
why the label was added and give a brief summary of how the issue may be
addressed.

Note how concise this is - it’s like reading a to-do list for the agent. The workflow runs whenever a new issue is opened or reopened. It checks for unlabeled issues, analyzes their content, and applies appropriate labels based on content analysis. It even leaves a friendly comment explaining the label choice.

In the frontmatter, we define permissions, tools, and safe outputs. This ensures the agent only has access to what it needs and can’t perform any unsafe actions. The natural language instructions in the body guide the agent’s behavior in a clear, human-readable way.

Issue triage workflows in public repositories may need to process issues from all contributors. By default, min-integrity: approved restricts agent visibility to owners, members, and collaborators. If you are a maintainer in a public repository and need your triage agent to see and label issues from users without push access, set min-integrity: none in your GitHub tools configuration. See Integrity Filtering for security considerations and best practices.

We’ve deliberately kept this workflow ultra-simple. In practice, in your own repo, customization is key. Triage differs in every repository. Tailoring workflows to your specific context will make them more effective. Generic agents are okay, but customized ones are often a better fit.

You can add this workflow to your own repository and remix it as follows:

Issue Triage Agent:

Terminal window
gh aw add-wizard https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/v0.45.5/.github/workflows/issue-triage-agent.md

Then edit and remix the workflow specification to meet your needs, regenerate the lock file using gh aw compile, and push to your repository. See our Quick Start for further installation and setup instructions.

You can also create your own workflows.

Next Up: Code Quality & Refactoring Workflows

Section titled “Next Up: Code Quality & Refactoring Workflows”

Now that we’ve explored how triage workflows help us stay on top of incoming activity, let’s turn to something far more radical and powerful: agents that continuously improve code.

Continue reading: Continuous Simplicity →


This is part 1 of a 19-part series exploring the workflows in Peli’s Agent Factory.

Welcome to Peli's Agent Factory

Peli de Halleux

Welcome, welcome, WELCOME to Peli’s Agent Factory!

Imagine a software repository where AI agents work alongside your team - not replacing developers, but handling the repetitive, time-consuming tasks that slow down collaboration and forward progress.

Peli’s Agent Factory is our exploration of what happens when you take the design philosophy of “let’s create a new automated agentic workflow for that” as the answer to almost every opportunity that arises! What happens when you max out on automated agentic workflows - when you make and use dozens of specialized, automated AI agentic workflows and use them in practice.

Software development is changing rapidly. This is our attempt to understand how automated agentic AI can make software teams more efficient, collaborative, and more enjoyable.

It’s basically a candy shop chocolate factory of agentic workflows. And we’d like to share it with you.

Let’s explore together!

Peli’s factory is a collection of automated agentic workflows we use in practice. We have built and operated over 100 automated agentic workflows within the github/gh-aw repository. These were used mostly in the context of the github/gh-aw project itself, but some have also been applied at scale in GitHub internal repositories. These weren’t hypothetical demos - they were working agents that:

Some workflows are “read-only analysts”. Others proactively propose changes through pull requests. Some are meta-agents that monitor and improve the health of other workflows.

We know we’re taking things to an extreme here. Most repositories won’t need dozens of agentic workflows. No one can read all these outputs (except, of course, another workflow). But by pushing the boundaries, we learned valuable lessons about what works, what doesn’t, and how to design safe, effective agentic workflows that teams can trust and use.

When we started exploring agentic workflows, we faced a fundamental question: What should repository-level automated agentic workflows actually do?

Rather than trying to build one “perfect” agent, we took a broad, heterogeneous approach:

  1. Embrace diversity - Create many specialized workflows as we identified opportunities
  2. Use them continuously - Run them in real development workflows
  3. Observe what works - Find which patterns work and which fail
  4. Share the knowledge - Catalog the structures that make agents safe and effective

The factory becomes both an experiment and a reference collection - a living library of patterns that others can study, adapt, and remix. Each workflow is written in natural language using Markdown, then converted into secure GitHub Actions that run with carefully scoped permissions with guardrails. Everything is observable, auditable, and remixable.

In our first series, Meet the Workflows, we’ll take you on a tour of the most interesting agents in the factory. Each article is bite-sized. If you’d like to skip ahead, here’s the full list of articles in the series:

  1. Meet a Simple Triage Workflow
  2. Introducing Continuous Simplicity
  3. Introducing Continuous Refactoring
  4. Introducing Continuous Style
  5. Introducing Continuous Improvement
  6. Introducing Continuous Documentation

After that we have a cornucopia of specialized workflow categories for you to dip into:

Every post comes with instructions about how to add the workflow to your own repository, or customize and remix it to create your own variant.

Running this many agents in production is a learning experience! We’ve watched agents succeed spectacularly and fail in instructive ways. Over the next few weeks, we’ll also be sharing what we’ve learned through a series of detailed articles. We’ll be looking at the design and operational patterns we’ve discovered, security lessons, and practical guides for building your own workflows.

To give a taste, some key lessons are emerging:

  • Repository-level automation is powerful - Agents embedded in the development workflow can have outsized impact
  • Specialization reveals possibilities - Focused agents allowed us to find more useful applications of automation than a single monolithic coding agent
  • Guardrails enable innovation - Strict constraints actually make it easier to experiment safely
  • Meta-agents are valuable - Agents that watch other agents become incredibly valuable
  • Cost-quality tradeoffs are real - Longer analyses aren’t always better

We’ll dive deeper into these lessons in upcoming articles.

Want to start with automated agentic workflows on GitHub? See our Quick Start.

Peli’s Agent Factory is by GitHub Next, Microsoft Research and collaborators, including Peli de Halleux, Don Syme, Mara Kiefer, Edward Aftandilian, Russell Horton, Jiaxiao Zhou. This is part of GitHub Next’s exploration of Continuous AI - making AI-enriched automation as routine as CI/CD.

Current Factory Status