Agent of the Day – November 3, 2026

Not every agent triages bugs or reviews code. Some of them write verse. Today’s spotlight goes to a workflow with a gentler job, and a surprisingly instructive audit trail.

Daily Fact runs on weekdays around 14:00 UTC. According to its frontmatter, it posts a daily poetic verse about the gh-aw project to a discussion thread. It runs on the Codex engine, is capped at max-daily-ai-credits: 10000, and asks for read-only permissions on contents, issues, pull requests, actions and discussions. Any write goes through safe outputs, not through the agent’s own token.

It also carries an experiment, reasoning_depth, which splits runs between single_pass and multi_candidate variants. The hypothesis, tracked in issue #31324, is that deliberating over several candidate facts before writing produces more novel verses and more reactions.

We pulled today’s scheduled run, 41651519733, with agentic-workflows logs and audit:

SignalObserved
Triggerschedule, main branch
Conclusionsuccess
Duration8.1 minutes
Turns1
Tokensabout 247k
AI creditsabout 8.7
Experiment variantsingle_pass
Errors / warnings0 / 0

The audit labels the behavior as read-only, with no write actions recorded in the run itself, and flags a heavy resource profile for the task shape: one turn, ten tool types, and a working set that was rebuilt across six invocations (about 4.6x the peak input). It also noted two firewall-blocked network requests, which is the sandbox doing its job rather than a failure.

Combined workflow activity chart

A poem is a small output. Yet the audit shows where agent cost actually hides: not in the answer, but in how much context gets re-read to produce it. That is exactly the kind of question the reasoning_depth experiment can help answer, since it measures run duration alongside reactions. A verse that costs less and lands just as well is a win.

Browse the workflow source, run gh aw audit on your own scheduled agents, and see what your quiet workflows are really doing. Start at github/gh-aw.